| |
| CA Strategic Plan |
| Recommendations |
|
Public Support |
Youth Involvement & Development |
|
Access to Care |
|
Service Coordination |
|
Families |
|
Communities |
|
Schools |
|
Data |
| |
|
 |
| |
| Outcome Areas |
|
Injury Prevention |
|
Mental Health and Suicide |
|
Nutrition & Physical Activity |
Alcohol, Tobacco & Other Drugs |
|
Teen Pregnancy & STIs |
|
Oral Health |
Environmental & Occupational Health |
Out of Home Youth –
Resources on Mental Health |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Families | Overview |
| |
|
|
 |
Build stable families
that can support teens |
 |
|
| |
| This is Chapter 2, Recommendation
5 of California's adolescent health strategic plan. To
view the full plan, click
here. |
Barriers to coordination among service providersThe human service
system lacks resources at all levels, resulting in limited time
to devote to each client. For medical providers, pressure to
see a large volume of patients makes it difficult to conduct
the type of comprehensive assessments that are needed. Similarly,
social workers have notoriously high case loads; teachers have
large classes; and school nurses cover multiple schools. The
system is stretched in all directions and cannot function to
its full potential. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The role of families in assuring
a successful transition through adolescence into adulthood
and in enhancing youth resiliency is well established. The
family often serves as one of the most important elements
in an adolescents life, creating the initial environment
in which they receive emotional, social, and economic support.
Supportive family relationships protect youth against many
different kinds of health risks, including emotional distress
and suicidal thoughts and attempts; cigarette, alcohol, and
marijuana use; violent behavior; and early sexual activity.
Data from the California Healthy Kids Survey suggest that
most teens feel supported by their families, but that the
perception of family support diminishes as teens age. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Financial Stability |
|
| |
California is entering the new millennium with one of the strongest
economies in many decades. Yet many low-income families are
experiencing increasing hardships. Despite the states
tremendous prosperity, the percentage of children living in
poverty in California (20.3%) is above the national average
of 16.9% (Figure 2.2), and is the fifth highest in the nation.
Many children and youth in California live with parents who
do not have full-time, year-round employment 31% in California
compared to 27% nationally. In 1997-1998, 1.4 million California
youth were receiving public assistance or living in families
supported by public assistance.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The cost of housing in some areas is emerging
as a critical obstacle to successfully moving families from
welfare to work. In many communities, it is not uncommon for
families on welfare to spend more than 50% of their grant on
housing. In 1996-1997, a national survey found that approximately
25% of low-income California parents experienced problems paying
their mortgage, rent, or utility bills.50 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
These figures are cause for concern. Almost
all health indicators become considerably worse as either income
or education decreases. Low income youth, for example, are at
least 50% more likely than higher income youth to die during
childhood. They are five times more likely to die from infectious
diseases before the age of 18, and are more than twice as likely
to lack a recent physician visit.51,52
They are also more likely to have risk factors such as cigarette
smoking, a sedentary lifestyle, and obesity, which put them
at higher risk for cardiovascular disease and cancer.53,54
Given the impact of poverty on health status, health service
utilization and health behaviors, the high percentage of youth
living in poverty or in economically unstable households must
be addressed in order to improve health outcomes. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Supportive Family Relationships |
|
| |
Supportive family relationships are an important foundation
for healthy adolescent development. A recent national study
on adolescent health found that, controlling for demographic
factors, youth who reported feeling connected to a parent were
protected against many different kinds of health risks including
emotional distress and suicidal behavior; cigarette, alcohol,
and marijuana use; violent behavior; and early sexual activity.55
Yet the changing needs of children as they enter adolescence,
parents lack of understanding of these developmental processes,
and generational differences make it challenging for parents
to support, discipline, and communicate with their teens. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Nonetheless, statewide data from the California
Healthy Kids Survey indicate that 60% to 76% of teens experience
a high level of family support (Indicator box). Similarly, among
over 1,556 ethnically diverse youth surveyed throughout the
state, 89% rated their family as one of the best things
they had going for them.56
Data from a national sample of predominantly white, rural and
suburban youth found that 64% reported supportive family situations.57 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Changes in the family environment have increased
the challenge of providing teens with the supports they need.
The percentage of single-parent families in California increased
from 23% in 1985 to 26% in 1997.58
Slightly more than half of all California youth today will spend
at least part of their childhood living with only one parent.59
In addition, there are now fewer extended families living together
and many more families with two working parents. These changes
have contributed to a decrease in the amount of time that teens
spend with their parents or other adults. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Services have not kept pace with changing
family needs. Many families have great difficulty finding community
resources such as after-school activities for teens, recreation
areas, or accessible public transportation. Family-friendly
employment arrangements are still difficult for many families
to find. And while there has been significant investment in
parent education for childbirth and infant care, far less societal
attention has been placed on equipping parents with the knowledge
and skills they need to successfully raise their adolescents.
The programs that do exist tend to be crisis-orientedreaching
families after problems have already emergedrather than
prevention-oriented. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Strategies |
|
| |
|
|
| |
1. Help families
achieve social and economic stability. |
|
| |
- Enact a state earned-income credit (EIC) (a refundable
tax credit for low-income working families) to supplement
the federal EIC. Eleven other states (as of January 2000)
have enacted EICs.
- Establish a permanent source of funding to help the private
market, public-housing agencies and non-profit housing organizations
build affordable housing units for low-income Californians.
- Ensure the availability of adequate funding for community-based
support and treatment services that assist families in coping
with severe stressors such as domestic or community violence,
substance abuse, gang participation, and caring for children
with severe disabilities or special health care needs.
- Increase family economic security by taking full advantage
of existing state, federal, and private funds, and by strengthening
services such as adult education, family literacy, job training/search,
housing assistance, affordable childcare, etc.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
2. Support families
in raising teens. |
|
| |
- Increase funding for family and teen resource
centers through new funding or mandated blending of existing
categorical programs. Ensure that new and existing family
resource centers meet the needs of teens and their families.
- Provide incentives for employers to adopt family-friendly
policies such as flexible hours or job sharing.
- Increase the availability and accessibility of parent
education and support for parents of adolescents. Place
special emphasis on assisting parents in supporting all
types of adolescents (e.g., those with special health care
needs, gay/lesbian youth, foster children). Promote strategies
that bring parents together in mutual-support settings (discussion
groups, parent-to-parent programs) as opposed to one-way
informational presentations.
|
|
|
| |
Click
here to view references |
|
| |
|
|